Many of the most valuable areas for wildlife are also the most beautiful. Consequently, people want to spend time there and understandably, they often want to take their four-legged friends with them. The presence of dogs can cause problems for wildlife and habitats, so how can these issues be managed successfully so that conflicting needs are balanced? Kate Priestman finds out more…
As an outdoor pursuit, dog walking is right up there as one of the most popular activities. It is good for human health and well-being, and it encourages people to be outside, enjoying their surroundings and experiencing nature first hand, which contributes towards a greater understanding of the natural world.
However, dogs and conservation objectives don’t always mix too well and there is no doubt that dogs can cause significant problems; those that are allowed off-lead for example, cover considerably more ground than the route of a footpath, so their effects can be widespread.
Uncontrolled off-lead activity can result in a significant disturbance of species, particularly ground-nesting birds and reptiles. Studies have shown that even when a dog is on a lead, their presence can result in the altered behaviour of birds and other species; this can cause ground-nesting birds to leave the nest, resulting in the loss of young birds.
Dogs have been shown to cause a greater behavioural reaction than walkers alone – a study in 2009 by the University of Hull for the Humber Nature Partnership, revealed that dog walking caused significant disruption to water birds. They found that off-lead dogs were causing more disruption than any other activity on the Humber coast, except for low-flying jet aircraft, which had the same category of severe disruption. The disturbance was shown to have a significant adverse effect on the time that birds spent foraging for food.
In 2007, a study of woodland trails was undertaken by the University of New South Wales (Dr Peter Banks and Jessica Bryant), which showed that dog walking caused a 41% reduction in the individual birds detected and a 35% reduction in species richness, when compared with untreated controls. Disturbance from humans walking alone was typically less than half that of dogs. In addition to disturbance, some dogs have a high prey drive and can chase and even kill animals if not closely monitored and controlled.
Habitats and plant species can also be affected. Off-lead activity can lead to physical damage of habitat through the trampling of vegetation, which can adversely damage more fragile species of plants.
And of course, we can’t ignore the mess that dogs leave behind if owners aren’t being vigilant or responsible, which is unpleasant and a potential health issue for other users if it is not picked up. It can also lead to localised alteration of soil conditions, which can result in adverse effects for vegetation – soils enriched with dog faeces encourage the growth of coarser plants such as nettles and thistles, which compete with and outgrow many wildflowers. Dog mess can also cause serious disease in domestic livestock, which are often used to manage nature reserves through conservation grazing techniques.
There are, however, ways to reduce the problems that dogs can cause for wildlife. In the most sensitive areas, the presence of dogs can be eliminated entirely, by not allowing people to bring dogs to the site. On less sensitive areas, open access/permissive access may be more appropriate.
When designing visitor access in the first instance, a clear overview of the numbers of dog owners who use the area is usually needed, in addition to understanding the ways in which they use it, and the relative significance of the benefits and problems that result from this use. This initial assessment can then be used as a baseline from which management planning and discussions with others can evolve. Attempts to influence the behaviour of dog owners have been shown to be most effective if they work collaboratively with the needs of these users.
The provision and location of infrastructure such as car parks, paths, viewpoints and interpretation facilities need careful consideration, in addition to measures such as signage and screening.
A second key focus is to promote responsible behaviour through effective communication.
Messages have been shown to be most effective if they clearly state the reason for the request, are realistic and proportionate, and are confined to locations where they are genuinely required.
Implementing seasonal restrictions in certain areas of a site can allow species such as ground nesting birds to successfully complete sensitive periods in peace. In addition, the use of signage and purpose-built routes that are clearly defined help to direct people away from sensitive areas.
Another technique is to designate areas for different activities – dogs allowed but on a lead, dogs allowed off-lead, and no dogs allowed at all – with defined codes of practice and any penalties clearly stated.
The provision of bins for dog waste makes dog walkers feel welcome and encourages them to dispose of their dog’s waste appropriately. However, on some sites where it is not practical to install bins, owners are being more frequently encouraged to clear the mess to one side, off main paths, rather than picking it up. This is to avoid the problem of people leaving bags hanging from tree branches and at the side of pathways.
Finally, if all other approaches are not working, formal regulatory measures such as byelaws are sometimes implemented. Reckless disturbance of breeding Schedule 1 birds is a criminal offence that can be addressed in conjunction with the police.
In summary, it appears that the key to successfully managing a site for all concerned begins by obtaining a thorough understanding of the behaviour and numbers of site users, followed by designing the site to accommodate this usage, whilst implementing supporting measures such as signage and infrastructure in a considered way; and last but not least, monitoring conditions on site and adapting policies as necessary.
- Lincolnshire Wildlife Trust Magazine article – Dogs and Nature Conservation by Robert Enderby.
- Cumbria Wildlife Trust.
- Scottish Wildlife Trust Policy – Dog Disturbance and Wildlife.
- Nottinghamshire Wildlife Trust.
- Butterfly Conservation policy.
- Managing access with dogs in protected areas to safeguard breeding birds – outdooraccess-scotland.com
- Taking the Lead – Managing access with dogs to reduce impacts on land management. Scottish Natural Heritage.
About the Author: Kate Priestman (CEnv, MCIEEM) has over sixteen years’ experience as an ecologist. Prior to setting up her own consultancy business in 2012, Kate worked in London for over a decade, providing the lead ecology role for a number of high-profile projects. Kate works as an artist, author, writer and editor.